civil barrister
MBL Seminar: Claims under the 1975 Act – Disputes, Pitfalls & Traps to Avoid
Speakers: Tara Lyons and Christopher Stead Date: 11 Oct 2024, 10:00 AM ‐ 4:30 PM Venue: London SRA Competency: B CPD: 5 hours Level: Intermediate: Requires some prior subject knowledge Introduction This new full day in-person course will provide comprehensive guidance on avoiding, limiting, managing, and resolving claims under the Inheritance (Provision for […]
MBL Seminar: Inheritance & Family Dependants – An Introduction to the 1975 Act
Speakers: Victoria Ellis and Oliver Foy Date: 20 Nov 2024, 9:30 AM ‐ 5:15 PM Venue: London SRA Competency: B CPD: 6 hours Level: Introduction: Requires no prior subject knowledge Introduction This full-day course is aimed at practitioners starting in this area or those wishing to refresh their knowledge of the essentials. It […]
MBL Seminar: Contentious Probate & Inheritance Disputes – A Guide to Their Efficient & Effective Resolution
Speakers: Mark Dubbery, Julian Reed, Christopher Stead Date: 25 Oct 2024, 9:30 AM ‐ 5:15 PM Venue: London SRA Competency: B CPD: 6 hours Level: Intermediate: Requires some prior subject knowledge Introduction An aging population, increasing property prices, and an increase in both the divorce rate and the creation of blended families provide […]
Louisa Simpson appointed a member of the Employment Lawyers Association Junior Committee
Louisa Simpson has been appointed to become a member of the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) Junior Committee 2024-25. She looks forward to working with and supporting junior employment lawyers, collaborating with ELA’s other committees to contribute to training, social and pastoral opportunities.
LOUISA SIMPSON SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDS TWO FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY CLAIMS THIS WEEK
Louisa Simpson, who is currently completing her Third Six in Chambers’ Civil Team, represented claimants in two Fast Track Personal Injury (RTA) claims this week. In both cases, the Defendant argued the Claimant had been fundamentally dishonest in relation to their injuries –allegations which Louisa successfully defended. In Claim 1, the Defendant argued the Claimant […]
