Edward enjoys sport, theatre and Italy.
"He is a great team player and, unusually for counsel, strategist. His ability to absorb and simplify the most complex facts and arguments is quite remarkable; and occasionally humbling."Legal 500 2021 Tier 1
"Highly thought of and very personable, with excellent attention to detail." "He is a very able communicator, very calm, and at the same time he puts forward his client's case effectively and robustly."Chambers & Partners 2021
"He's often against silks and he's more than able to meet the standard."Chambers & Partners 2020
"A top senior junior choice. A match for any Silk."Legal 500
"Exceptional in terms of preparation and has a straightforward but compassionate negotiation style"Chambers & Partners 2019
Edward Boydell is head of the Family Finance team and is highly experienced in all aspects of family law but particularly financial remedies (including civil partnerships).
Edward has for many years been listed in Band One of “Leaders at the Bar” in both Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners directory for his family finance work.
The Legal 500 2021 lists him in Tier 1: “He is a great team player and, unusually for counsel, strategist. His ability to absorb and simplify the most complex facts and arguments is quite remarkable; and occasionally humbling.”
In Chambers & Partners 2020 Edward is listed as a Leader of the Bar both for the Western Circuit and for the South-Eastern Circuit: “He has a superb ability to explain court processes and outcomes to clients in a clear and easy manner.” “He’s a standout because he’s often against silks and he’s more than able to meet the standard.”
Comments in previous editions of Chambers & Partners include: 2019 “Edward Boydell is Head of the family finance team, with over two decades’ experience advising on matrimonial finance. He regularly represents high net worth clients in cases involving challenging assets such as farms, family companies and overseas trusts. Strengths: Ed is an outstanding senior junior. He is clearly very bright and a brilliant advocate, who has no reservations about ruffling a few feathers if that is in his client’s interests.” 2018:”Edward Boydell is superb and shows great attention to detail. He has an easy rapport with clients and an extraordinary ability to master and absorb complex cases.” “His reputation, creativity and client care very much make him stand out from the crop. He is an exceptional advocate with a very good grasp of detail.” “He is very calm and methodical, and good with clients.“ 2017: Edward Boydell “is always exceptionally prepared, he is a fantastic negotiator and advocate who suits almost every client due to his versatile personality.” “Excellent client-handling and thorough analytical skills.”His reputation, creativity and client care very much make him stand out from the crop. He is an exceptional advocate with a very good grasp of detail.” “He is very calm and methodical, and good with clients.”
Edward is also listed as a “Leading Junior” in Band One of the Legal 500 which has described him as “a match for any silk” and “a clear and analytical barrister, who has an excellent client manner that inspires confidence” and that “his advocacy style is relaxed, fluent and confident“.
Edward is available to conduct Private FDRs. He is one of relatively few Recorders to be ticketed to hear Family Finance appeals and has over 15 years experience of sitting in the family courts. He has been appointed as a judge of the Financial Remedies Court.
Edward is highly experienced in all aspects of family law, but particularly financial remedies (including civil partnerships). He has specific expertise in dealing with complex high net worth matters involving family businesses, farms, companies and trusts. He is also very experienced in equitable co-ownership cases under TOLATA. Particularly well known for his family finance work and recognised as one of the “Leaders at the Bar”.
H’s application to terminate PPs of over £45,000 pa 13 years after divorce. H sought an immediate termination, W a substantial replacing lump sum. Court determined an immediate termination. Edward Boydell for H instructed by Rita Gupta of LGFL
£10m case concerning property holdings and waste management businesses in Hampshire. Edward Boydell instructed by Simon Burge of Blake Morgan LLP for H
c£25m case concerning a pre-nuptial agreement under which W receives 30% of the combined family wealth subject to a minimum sum. Issues included W’s case that 30% would not provide for her needs and calculation disputes as to the assets. Edward Boydell for H instructed by Erica Shelton and Charlotte Posnasky of Charles Russell Speechlys LL
c£5M case in which it was alleged that W had attempted to commit fraud by forging court documents leading to a final consent order in 2007. H applied to set aside the orders and matter was eventually compromised before Mostyn J. Edward Boydell instructed by Wilsons was led by Nicholas Francis QC
4M case concerning the applicability of a post-nuptial settlement signed by the parties in Spain after 2 years of a 10 year marriage. Further issues were raised such as the relevance of pre-acquired assets and whether the court should have regard to the types and range of orders that would be made if the case were being heard in Spain, the family being essentially Spanish and all residing in Madrid. The case was heard over 7 days before Eleanor King J. Edward Boydell instructed by Wilsons.
Parties agreed to divide £40M equally after a long marriage. Both parties wished to retain a French chateau bought and restored over the last 9 years of the marriage. Single issue hearing to determine who should retain the chateau fought over 3 days before Sir Hugh Bennett. Edward Boydell led by Nicholas Francis QC for H.
c£5M farming case. H and W farmed large estate held largely in H’s family trusts over long marriage. There were issues as to relevance of inherited wealth and resources. Compromised shortly before trial in May 2012. Edward Boydell instructed by Wilsons
Roberts J exploring needs after the parties had divided c£11.5m assets prior to trial.
Decision of Roberts J in an ‘unusual application’ by a former wife for a financial remedy order in respect of A who is the parties’ only child, who is six years old.
Edward enjoys sport, theatre and Italy.