Variation of Periodical Payments Orders
News
13th May 2015
Andrew Grime looks at the recent first instance decision in the case of Taylor v Bell & Haworth [2015] All ER (D) 208 (Feb) which is the first case dealing with the extent of the court’s discretion to vary an order for periodical payments under Section 6 the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependants) Act 1975 (hereafter referred to as ‘the 1975 Act’).
To view the article in full, which was first published by LawSkills please click here.
Related barristers
Search articles
Related areas
- Administrative & Public Law
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Building & Construction
- Child Abduction
- Children Law (Private)
- Children Law (Public)
- Civil Fraud
- Civil Mediation
- Clinical Negligence
- Commercial
- Commercial Arbitration
- Court of Protection
- Courts Martial
- Criminal
- Direct Access
- Domestic Abuse
- Ecclesiastical & Religious Law
- Employment
- Equestrian Law
- Family Arbitration
- Family Finance
- Financial Services & Business Regulation
- Health & Safety
- Healthcare
- Inheritance Mediation
- Inheritance, Wills & Probate
- Inquests & Inquiries
- Nigerian Law
- Personal Injury
- Planning, Environmental & Village Greens
- Private FDR
- Professional Discipline
- Professional Negligence
- Property Law
- Regulatory & Disciplinary
- Road Traffic Offences
- Serious Violence & Murder
- Serious and organised crime
- Sexual Offences
- Transport Law
- Trusts of Land