Blog

Post date: 10th May 2018
By Mark Ruffell

Mark Ruffell looks at sentencing for perverting the course of justice.

Post date: 16th Mar 2018
By Ezra Macdonald

The case of Reilly v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2018] UKSC 16 is – understandably – drawing a large amount of commentary,

Post date: 12th Feb 2018
By Ezra Macdonald

Did the EAT err in law in finding that a member of an LLP who acts “reasonably” in withdrawing his labour will not, as a matter of law, act wrongfully or in repudiatory breach of the LLP members’ agreement, and accordingly may be awarded losses flowing from a subsequent expulsion pursuant to the

Post date: 29th Jan 2018
By Ezra Macdonald

In the recent decision in Okedina v Chikale UKEAT/0152/17/RN the EAT (HHJ Eady QC) considered the question of when a Claimant’s contract of employment would be said to be illegal by virtue of the operation of immig

Post date: 3rd Jan 2018
By Ezra Macdonald

Ezra Macdonald provides a brief round-up of reported TUPE cases from 2017.

Post date: 12th Dec 2017
By Ezra Macdonald

When considering whether a dismissal is an automatically unfair “whistleblowing” dismissal, is it permissible to consider the mental processes of anyone other than the decision-taker? In particular, what if the decision-taker was “manipulated” by another of the Respondent’s employees?

Post date: 4th Dec 2017
By Ezra Macdonald

When is an employer liable for the criminal actions of a rogue employee in disclosing personal information of co-employees on the web?

Post date: 1st Dec 2017
By Heather Platt

The issue of religious discrimination in the work place is a sensitive one which employers need to consider carefully.

Post date: 30th Nov 2017
By Ezra Macdonald

The decision of the CJEU in King v Sash Windows C-214/16 CJEU has been widely reported and discussed.

Post date: 1st Nov 2017
By Paul Mertens

Paul Mertens reviews the recent decision of Howlett v Davies [2017] EWCA Civ 1696, the first case in which the Court of Appeal has considered the approach to “fundamental dishonesty” as an exception to Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting (QOCS) under CPR 44.16(1).

Pages

Subscribe to Blog